<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Part I:  Historiographical Methods and Biblical Christology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://percaritatem.com/2007/10/03/part-i-historiographical-methods-and-biblical-christology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://percaritatem.com/2007/10/03/part-i-historiographical-methods-and-biblical-christology/</link>
	<description>Non intratur in veritatem nisi per caritatem.  St. Augustine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:47:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Enloe</title>
		<link>http://percaritatem.com/2007/10/03/part-i-historiographical-methods-and-biblical-christology/comment-page-1/#comment-1444</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Enloe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 22:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://percaritatem.com/2007/10/03/part-i-historiographical-methods-and-biblical-christology/#comment-1444</guid>
		<description>If I&#039;ve been paying attention sufficiently in class, I think Father Roch is saying there are actual contradictions in the Gospels, such as differing accounts of the number of angels at the tomb. But he makes clear that he thinks the Holy Spirit used the authors of the Gospels to give a multi-form testimony about Christ that, as you said, makes the reported transcend the reports. And he doesn&#039;t think that harmonization efforts, whether the early ones like Tatian or modern ones, are the way to handle Scripture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;ve been paying attention sufficiently in class, I think Father Roch is saying there are actual contradictions in the Gospels, such as differing accounts of the number of angels at the tomb. But he makes clear that he thinks the Holy Spirit used the authors of the Gospels to give a multi-form testimony about Christ that, as you said, makes the reported transcend the reports. And he doesn&#8217;t think that harmonization efforts, whether the early ones like Tatian or modern ones, are the way to handle Scripture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah Tillman</title>
		<link>http://percaritatem.com/2007/10/03/part-i-historiographical-methods-and-biblical-christology/comment-page-1/#comment-1438</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah Tillman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://percaritatem.com/2007/10/03/part-i-historiographical-methods-and-biblical-christology/#comment-1438</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s wonderful to hear about scholars who are able to walk lines that the critics of faith thought impossible.

If there are contradictions between the Gospels (and I doubt there are, in the strict logical sense of &quot;contradiction through explicit negation&quot; (e.g., the symbolic logic &lt;i&gt;reductio ad absurdum&lt;/i&gt;)) what it proves is that the reported transcends the reports. Which is how it should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s wonderful to hear about scholars who are able to walk lines that the critics of faith thought impossible.</p>
<p>If there are contradictions between the Gospels (and I doubt there are, in the strict logical sense of &#8220;contradiction through explicit negation&#8221; (e.g., the symbolic logic <i>reductio ad absurdum</i>)) what it proves is that the reported transcends the reports. Which is how it should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia R. Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://percaritatem.com/2007/10/03/part-i-historiographical-methods-and-biblical-christology/comment-page-1/#comment-1436</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia R. Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://percaritatem.com/2007/10/03/part-i-historiographical-methods-and-biblical-christology/#comment-1436</guid>
		<description>Hi Justin,

Good to hear from you!  What have you been up to?

Cynthia



Mike,

When are you going to send me the Calvin paper?  : ) How about making a condensed version into a three part guest post series?  

Cynthia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Justin,</p>
<p>Good to hear from you!  What have you been up to?</p>
<p>Cynthia</p>
<p>Mike,</p>
<p>When are you going to send me the Calvin paper?  : ) How about making a condensed version into a three part guest post series?  </p>
<p>Cynthia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ressourcement</title>
		<link>http://percaritatem.com/2007/10/03/part-i-historiographical-methods-and-biblical-christology/comment-page-1/#comment-1434</link>
		<dc:creator>Ressourcement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 07:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://percaritatem.com/2007/10/03/part-i-historiographical-methods-and-biblical-christology/#comment-1434</guid>
		<description>Cynthia,

I like the new look of the site... haven&#039;t been here in... a year?

I was introduced to Kereszty&#039;s book as an undergrad and &quot;had to&quot; become quite familiar with it.  While I have other &quot;classics&quot; on the wall, with regard to Christology, his is the one with the tape on the binding and pieces of sticky-pad hanging out everywhere.  I thought his notes on &quot;aliens&quot; was a little ... &quot;interesting&quot;, but overall it is a handy source.  

Another title, &quot;Wedding Feast of the Lamb&quot;, was good.

jn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cynthia,</p>
<p>I like the new look of the site&#8230; haven&#8217;t been here in&#8230; a year?</p>
<p>I was introduced to Kereszty&#8217;s book as an undergrad and &#8220;had to&#8221; become quite familiar with it.  While I have other &#8220;classics&#8221; on the wall, with regard to Christology, his is the one with the tape on the binding and pieces of sticky-pad hanging out everywhere.  I thought his notes on &#8220;aliens&#8221; was a little &#8230; &#8220;interesting&#8221;, but overall it is a handy source.  </p>
<p>Another title, &#8220;Wedding Feast of the Lamb&#8221;, was good.</p>
<p>jn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://percaritatem.com/2007/10/03/part-i-historiographical-methods-and-biblical-christology/comment-page-1/#comment-1433</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 03:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://percaritatem.com/2007/10/03/part-i-historiographical-methods-and-biblical-christology/#comment-1433</guid>
		<description>It strikes me that 2-4 are all intimately related to 1 (in your list of things evangelicals would probably have trouble with).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It strikes me that 2-4 are all intimately related to 1 (in your list of things evangelicals would probably have trouble with).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
