<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Part III: Alyosha and Zarathustra on Com-passion and a Genuine Embodied Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://percaritatem.com/2008/12/05/part-iii-alyosha-and-zarathustra-on-com-passion-and-a-genuine-embodied-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://percaritatem.com/2008/12/05/part-iii-alyosha-and-zarathustra-on-com-passion-and-a-genuine-embodied-life/</link>
	<description>Non intratur in veritatem nisi per caritatem.  St. Augustine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:27:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia R. Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://percaritatem.com/2008/12/05/part-iii-alyosha-and-zarathustra-on-com-passion-and-a-genuine-embodied-life/comment-page-1/#comment-3845</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia R. Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 02:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://percaritatem.com/?p=839#comment-3845</guid>
		<description>Hi Barrett, 

Thanks for commenting. Nietzsche’s doctrine of the “eternal recurrence of the same” is interpreted in many different ways, but I tend to take it as a call to embrace life to the fullest—whether in sufferings or joy--a call to be a Yes-sayer, not a nay-sayer.  In short, rather than take the doctrine in an overly literal way, I see it as an existential challenge to embrace life and to make one’s choices count—keeping front and center that what one chooses will in some sense be one’s eternal destiny (as one of my professors noted (R. Wood), you can think of it (though Nietzsche would hate the comparison) as a kind of a secularized version of heaven or hell.  

On whether N’s concepts of night vs. day wisdom affect his rejection of pity—honestly, I’ve never thought about it; it’s a great question.  Do you have any thoughts as to how it might tie in to his negative take on pity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Barrett, </p>
<p>Thanks for commenting. Nietzsche’s doctrine of the “eternal recurrence of the same” is interpreted in many different ways, but I tend to take it as a call to embrace life to the fullest—whether in sufferings or joy&#8211;a call to be a Yes-sayer, not a nay-sayer.  In short, rather than take the doctrine in an overly literal way, I see it as an existential challenge to embrace life and to make one’s choices count—keeping front and center that what one chooses will in some sense be one’s eternal destiny (as one of my professors noted (R. Wood), you can think of it (though Nietzsche would hate the comparison) as a kind of a secularized version of heaven or hell.  </p>
<p>On whether N’s concepts of night vs. day wisdom affect his rejection of pity—honestly, I’ve never thought about it; it’s a great question.  Do you have any thoughts as to how it might tie in to his negative take on pity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barrett Turner</title>
		<link>http://percaritatem.com/2008/12/05/part-iii-alyosha-and-zarathustra-on-com-passion-and-a-genuine-embodied-life/comment-page-1/#comment-3843</link>
		<dc:creator>Barrett Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://percaritatem.com/?p=839#comment-3843</guid>
		<description>Cynthia,
First time commenting.
Thanks for the succinct explanation of Nietzsche&#039;s genealogy.  I recently tried to interact with his description of slave morality in a short paper on an imprecatory psalm.
The comparison of Ivan and Alyosha in terms of abstraction meeting reality in actual works of charity and compassion:  brilliant.  I would never have put it in those terms.  Very helpful and a challenge to me personally, too.
I have never heard of the &quot;day/night wisdom&quot; distinction.  How does this concept, if at all, affect Nietzsche&#039;s rejection of pity?  Also, what is Nietzsche&#039;s doctrine of eternal recurrence?  Sounds like something I might have read about but I obviously didn&#039;t retain it.
Thanks!  Have yet to read pt. 4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cynthia,<br />
First time commenting.<br />
Thanks for the succinct explanation of Nietzsche&#8217;s genealogy.  I recently tried to interact with his description of slave morality in a short paper on an imprecatory psalm.<br />
The comparison of Ivan and Alyosha in terms of abstraction meeting reality in actual works of charity and compassion:  brilliant.  I would never have put it in those terms.  Very helpful and a challenge to me personally, too.<br />
I have never heard of the &#8220;day/night wisdom&#8221; distinction.  How does this concept, if at all, affect Nietzsche&#8217;s rejection of pity?  Also, what is Nietzsche&#8217;s doctrine of eternal recurrence?  Sounds like something I might have read about but I obviously didn&#8217;t retain it.<br />
Thanks!  Have yet to read pt. 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Rose</title>
		<link>http://percaritatem.com/2008/12/05/part-iii-alyosha-and-zarathustra-on-com-passion-and-a-genuine-embodied-life/comment-page-1/#comment-3812</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://percaritatem.com/?p=839#comment-3812</guid>
		<description>Just found this. D and N are my mainstays along with some others. I will be back to read in depth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just found this. D and N are my mainstays along with some others. I will be back to read in depth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

