Comments on: From Nietzsche’s Despair Through Husserl’s Inner-Time Consciousness to Gadamer’s Open, Fluid Horizon http://percaritatem.com/2009/05/22/from-nietzsches-despair-through-husserls-inner-time-consciousness-to-gadamers-open-fluid-horizon/ Non intratur in veritatem nisi per caritatem. St. Augustine Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:47:48 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: jim kusch http://percaritatem.com/2009/05/22/from-nietzsches-despair-through-husserls-inner-time-consciousness-to-gadamers-open-fluid-horizon/comment-page-1/#comment-5612 jim kusch Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:55:40 +0000 http://percaritatem.com/?p=1360#comment-5612 I am teaching in Cyprus, Nietzsche argues horizon in Will rur Macht. I am teaching in Cyprus, Nietzsche argues horizon in Will rur Macht.

]]> By: Matthew D. Barry http://percaritatem.com/2009/05/22/from-nietzsches-despair-through-husserls-inner-time-consciousness-to-gadamers-open-fluid-horizon/comment-page-1/#comment-4973 Matthew D. Barry Fri, 29 May 2009 19:28:56 +0000 http://percaritatem.com/?p=1360#comment-4973 I was looking where you said the following: "For Nietzsche, it is crucial that we embrace the fact of our limited horizons; yet, in doing so, we ultimately land in despair, as we can no longer hope to find any ultimate meaning in an absolute sense". Now, I don't know who is speaking here in the end. And I am not familiar with Lammi's work so as to make a comment there. I simply have a question as to how you would understand Nietzsche on horizon's in "On the Use and Disuse". Does the above comment apply? Or does he understand horizon differently? Or should I say does he accept talk of horizons? I appreciate your help. Thank you. I was looking where you said the following:
“For Nietzsche, it is crucial that we embrace the fact of our limited horizons; yet, in doing so, we ultimately land in despair, as we can no longer hope to find any ultimate meaning in an absolute sense”.
Now, I don’t know who is speaking here in the end. And I am not familiar with Lammi’s work so as to make a comment there. I simply have a question as to how you would understand Nietzsche on horizon’s in “On the Use and Disuse”. Does the above comment apply? Or does he understand horizon differently? Or should I say does he accept talk of horizons?

I appreciate your help. Thank you.

]]> By: Cynthia R. Nielsen http://percaritatem.com/2009/05/22/from-nietzsches-despair-through-husserls-inner-time-consciousness-to-gadamers-open-fluid-horizon/comment-page-1/#comment-4969 Cynthia R. Nielsen Thu, 28 May 2009 13:47:21 +0000 http://percaritatem.com/?p=1360#comment-4969 Hi Matthew, I'm not exactly sure that I understand what you are asking, but I start the dialogue and you can give me more details as we go. Keep in mind that in the current post on Gadamer, Lammi questions Gadamer's interpretation of Nietzsche. Would you be more specific as to what you see in the work that you reference (by Nietzsche) that is in conflict with the idea of limited, partial horizons? Best wishes, Cynthia Hi Matthew,

I’m not exactly sure that I understand what you are asking, but I start the dialogue and you can give me more details as we go. Keep in mind that in the current post on Gadamer, Lammi questions Gadamer’s interpretation of Nietzsche. Would you be more specific as to what you see in the work that you reference (by Nietzsche) that is in conflict with the idea of limited, partial horizons?

Best wishes,
Cynthia

]]> By: Matthew D. Barry http://percaritatem.com/2009/05/22/from-nietzsches-despair-through-husserls-inner-time-consciousness-to-gadamers-open-fluid-horizon/comment-page-1/#comment-4967 Matthew D. Barry Thu, 28 May 2009 03:47:21 +0000 http://percaritatem.com/?p=1360#comment-4967 Hello Cynthia, Hermeneutics is not my speciality. But I do wonder how you would read the younger Nietzsche in "On the Use and Disuse of History for Life". You mention his instruction that we embrace the limited horizons. Yet he doesn't seem to like this in the work I mention. What do you think? Hello Cynthia,

Hermeneutics is not my speciality. But I do wonder how you would read the younger Nietzsche in “On the Use and Disuse of History for Life”. You mention his instruction that we embrace the limited horizons. Yet he doesn’t seem to like this in the work I mention. What do you think?

]]>