<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Part I: Fanon’s Descent Under the Burden of the White Gaze</title>
	<atom:link href="http://percaritatem.com/2009/11/17/part-i-fanon%e2%80%99s-descent-under-the-burden-of-the-white-gaze/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://percaritatem.com/2009/11/17/part-i-fanon%e2%80%99s-descent-under-the-burden-of-the-white-gaze/</link>
	<description>Non intratur in veritatem nisi per caritatem.  St. Augustine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:14:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia R. Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://percaritatem.com/2009/11/17/part-i-fanon%e2%80%99s-descent-under-the-burden-of-the-white-gaze/comment-page-1/#comment-5443</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia R. Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://percaritatem.com/?p=1701#comment-5443</guid>
		<description>@ Dru

Always good to hear from you!  I encourage you to read Fanon&#039;s, _Black Skin, White Masks_, given your interests, you&#039;ll love it.  

@ Gregory:

I don&#039;t think Fanon would necessarily deny that he is other to himself; however, when are treated merely as a res, a thing, being merely a &quot;man among men&quot; is quite attractive. Keep in mind that Fanon knows how to use rhetoric quite well--don&#039;t miss his irony. 

Who am I?  I&#039;m not what I was ten years ago, yet what I was 10 years ago is still some aspect of me.  Nor do I know what I will be, but what I hope to be influences me to some extent now.  Ask me tomorrow, and we&#039;ll see if we get a different answer.

Cynthia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Dru</p>
<p>Always good to hear from you!  I encourage you to read Fanon&#8217;s, _Black Skin, White Masks_, given your interests, you&#8217;ll love it.  </p>
<p>@ Gregory:</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Fanon would necessarily deny that he is other to himself; however, when are treated merely as a res, a thing, being merely a &#8220;man among men&#8221; is quite attractive. Keep in mind that Fanon knows how to use rhetoric quite well&#8211;don&#8217;t miss his irony. </p>
<p>Who am I?  I&#8217;m not what I was ten years ago, yet what I was 10 years ago is still some aspect of me.  Nor do I know what I will be, but what I hope to be influences me to some extent now.  Ask me tomorrow, and we&#8217;ll see if we get a different answer.</p>
<p>Cynthia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory</title>
		<link>http://percaritatem.com/2009/11/17/part-i-fanon%e2%80%99s-descent-under-the-burden-of-the-white-gaze/comment-page-1/#comment-5442</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://percaritatem.com/?p=1701#comment-5442</guid>
		<description>&quot;I simply wanted to be a man among men...&quot;. No indication here that each of us is also Other to ourselves or, as Hegel would say (and endlessly repeated by Zizek), the &#039;mysteries of the Egyptians were a mystery to the Egyptians themselves&#039;... No one is &#039;simply&#039; a &#039;man among men&#039;---Merleau-Ponty understood this better than Fanon, I think. But, really, Cynthia: who are you???? Posts, all stimulating, provocative and, above all, highly competent, on Augustine, Descartes, Hans-Georg G. and Rowan W.; and now Fanon: I am impressed and gratified .... really (I don&#039;t usually expect this from America)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I simply wanted to be a man among men&#8230;&#8221;. No indication here that each of us is also Other to ourselves or, as Hegel would say (and endlessly repeated by Zizek), the &#8216;mysteries of the Egyptians were a mystery to the Egyptians themselves&#8217;&#8230; No one is &#8217;simply&#8217; a &#8216;man among men&#8217;&#8212;Merleau-Ponty understood this better than Fanon, I think. But, really, Cynthia: who are you???? Posts, all stimulating, provocative and, above all, highly competent, on Augustine, Descartes, Hans-Georg G. and Rowan W.; and now Fanon: I am impressed and gratified &#8230;. really (I don&#8217;t usually expect this from America)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dru johnson</title>
		<link>http://percaritatem.com/2009/11/17/part-i-fanon%e2%80%99s-descent-under-the-burden-of-the-white-gaze/comment-page-1/#comment-5441</link>
		<dc:creator>dru johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://percaritatem.com/?p=1701#comment-5441</guid>
		<description>Cynthia,

This is a great!  Thanks for bringing this to my attention.  I really like what Ponty does in Phenomenology of Perception, but I still endlessly struggle with prepositions about how we know through/with/as our bodies.  

This work of Fanon looks like a great pedagogical tool to get students thinking about embodiment and all the epistemological baggage that comes with it.  Thanks again for pointing this out to us.

Dru</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cynthia,</p>
<p>This is a great!  Thanks for bringing this to my attention.  I really like what Ponty does in Phenomenology of Perception, but I still endlessly struggle with prepositions about how we know through/with/as our bodies.  </p>
<p>This work of Fanon looks like a great pedagogical tool to get students thinking about embodiment and all the epistemological baggage that comes with it.  Thanks again for pointing this out to us.</p>
<p>Dru</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
