<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Part I:  An Introduction to Hans-Georg Gadamer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://percaritatem.com/2009/11/29/part-i-an-introduction-to-hans-georg-gadamer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://percaritatem.com/2009/11/29/part-i-an-introduction-to-hans-georg-gadamer/</link>
	<description>Non intratur in veritatem nisi per caritatem.  St. Augustine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:14:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: I tidied up the kitchenette, I tuned the old banjo … &#171; P e r ∙ C r u c e m ∙ a d ∙ L u c e m</title>
		<link>http://percaritatem.com/2009/11/29/part-i-an-introduction-to-hans-georg-gadamer/comment-page-1/#comment-5474</link>
		<dc:creator>I tidied up the kitchenette, I tuned the old banjo … &#171; P e r ∙ C r u c e m ∙ a d ∙ L u c e m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://percaritatem.com/?p=1726#comment-5474</guid>
		<description>[...] Nielsen introduces Hans-Georg Gadamer (Part I, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nielsen introduces Hans-Georg Gadamer (Part I, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia R. Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://percaritatem.com/2009/11/29/part-i-an-introduction-to-hans-georg-gadamer/comment-page-1/#comment-5466</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia R. Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://percaritatem.com/?p=1726#comment-5466</guid>
		<description>Hi Brett,

I&#039;m not familiar with Warnke&#039;s argument regarding Habermas.  Would you elaborate and give me the specifics of her claims?  One of the best essays I&#039;ve come across on Gadamer and the issue of relativism is Brice Wachterhauser&#039;s essay in the _Cambridge Companion to Gadamer_. 

Tacitus, 

Of course Gadamer is not going to provide a foundationalist justification for legitimate prejudices or interpretations--he rejects the foundationalist project.  However, he does speak of not forcing one&#039;s projections on a text, but instead allowing the text as Other to &quot;speak&quot; and transform one&#039;s own horizon.  The model is one of &quot;coming to an understanding&quot; not one of scientific mastery where the text as inert &quot;object&quot; is mastered and has no voice. For a more detailed elaboration of what I mention here, see Charles Taylor&#039;s article in the _Cambridge Companion to Gadamer_, &quot;Gadamer and the Human Sciences.&quot;  

Best wishes,
Cynthia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brett,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not familiar with Warnke&#8217;s argument regarding Habermas.  Would you elaborate and give me the specifics of her claims?  One of the best essays I&#8217;ve come across on Gadamer and the issue of relativism is Brice Wachterhauser&#8217;s essay in the _Cambridge Companion to Gadamer_. </p>
<p>Tacitus, </p>
<p>Of course Gadamer is not going to provide a foundationalist justification for legitimate prejudices or interpretations&#8211;he rejects the foundationalist project.  However, he does speak of not forcing one&#8217;s projections on a text, but instead allowing the text as Other to &#8220;speak&#8221; and transform one&#8217;s own horizon.  The model is one of &#8220;coming to an understanding&#8221; not one of scientific mastery where the text as inert &#8220;object&#8221; is mastered and has no voice. For a more detailed elaboration of what I mention here, see Charles Taylor&#8217;s article in the _Cambridge Companion to Gadamer_, &#8220;Gadamer and the Human Sciences.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Best wishes,<br />
Cynthia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tacitus</title>
		<link>http://percaritatem.com/2009/11/29/part-i-an-introduction-to-hans-georg-gadamer/comment-page-1/#comment-5465</link>
		<dc:creator>Tacitus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://percaritatem.com/?p=1726#comment-5465</guid>
		<description>You say that Gadamer is not a strong relativist. True, he doesn&#039;t want to be... but does he succeed in answering his own &quot;fundamental epistemological question&quot; which is &quot;what distinguishes legitimate prejudices from the countless others, which it is the undeniable task of critical reason to overcome?&quot; (TM&#039;89 p277) I&#039;m not sure that he has the resources to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say that Gadamer is not a strong relativist. True, he doesn&#8217;t want to be&#8230; but does he succeed in answering his own &#8220;fundamental epistemological question&#8221; which is &#8220;what distinguishes legitimate prejudices from the countless others, which it is the undeniable task of critical reason to overcome?&#8221; (TM&#8217;89 p277) I&#8217;m not sure that he has the resources to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Williams</title>
		<link>http://percaritatem.com/2009/11/29/part-i-an-introduction-to-hans-georg-gadamer/comment-page-1/#comment-5464</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://percaritatem.com/?p=1726#comment-5464</guid>
		<description>Cynthia,

Thanks; I look forward to forthcoming posts. Question: Do you agree with Georgia Warnke equating Gadamer&#039;s view of authority with Habermas&#039;s defense of Enlightenment ideals? I concur that Gadamer seems to be more conservative than many credit. Would you even classify him as a relativist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cynthia,</p>
<p>Thanks; I look forward to forthcoming posts. Question: Do you agree with Georgia Warnke equating Gadamer&#8217;s view of authority with Habermas&#8217;s defense of Enlightenment ideals? I concur that Gadamer seems to be more conservative than many credit. Would you even classify him as a relativist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Introduction to Gadamer &#171; New Testament Interpretation</title>
		<link>http://percaritatem.com/2009/11/29/part-i-an-introduction-to-hans-georg-gadamer/comment-page-1/#comment-5461</link>
		<dc:creator>An Introduction to Gadamer &#171; New Testament Interpretation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://percaritatem.com/?p=1726#comment-5461</guid>
		<description>[...] Introduction to&#160;Gadamer  Over at Per Caritatem, Cynthia Nielsen has begun an introduction to the work of Hans-Georg Gadamer. For as many as I have read, Cynthia&#8217;s posts are perennially interesting and clearly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Introduction to&nbsp;Gadamer  Over at Per Caritatem, Cynthia Nielsen has begun an introduction to the work of Hans-Georg Gadamer. For as many as I have read, Cynthia&#8217;s posts are perennially interesting and clearly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
