<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rowan Williams on the Complexities of the Church’s History and Identity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://percaritatem.com/2010/01/11/rowan-williams-on-the-complexities-of-the-church%e2%80%99s-history-and-identity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://percaritatem.com/2010/01/11/rowan-williams-on-the-complexities-of-the-church%e2%80%99s-history-and-identity/</link>
	<description>Non intratur in veritatem nisi per caritatem.  St. Augustine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:47:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Collins Aki</title>
		<link>http://percaritatem.com/2010/01/11/rowan-williams-on-the-complexities-of-the-church%e2%80%99s-history-and-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-5590</link>
		<dc:creator>Collins Aki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://percaritatem.com/?p=1811#comment-5590</guid>
		<description>Hello! I got word of this blog via my good friend and brother Matt Boulter (religiocity.org). I like the issues that you blog about. I agree that understanding the current state of the church for a better grasp of the future state of the church, can not be done without an understanding of the church&#039;s past. But I wonder how radical is that, with Williams &quot;emphasiz[ing] throughout that the Church is founded and sustained by divine action&quot;? To me, that has always been the emphasized part of the church&#039;s narrative especially when dealing with her shortcomings (and at times a means for justification, rather than a silver lining). I am a little more interested in reading about, as you noted, &quot;the interplay between historical contingencies and the ways in which history &#039;makes&#039; us on the one hand, and the reality of transcultural (yet contextually-applied) truths on the other&quot;. I think the real story of the Church can be found in the story of its members and those &quot;11th hour&quot; parts of the Body found in the highways and by-ways of God&#039;s redemptive plan. I would like to see him emphasize that. At any rate, I have sampled a few of William&#039;s books from my buddy Matt&#039;s library, and he appears to be a very engaging writer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! I got word of this blog via my good friend and brother Matt Boulter (religiocity.org). I like the issues that you blog about. I agree that understanding the current state of the church for a better grasp of the future state of the church, can not be done without an understanding of the church&#8217;s past. But I wonder how radical is that, with Williams &#8220;emphasiz[ing] throughout that the Church is founded and sustained by divine action&#8221;? To me, that has always been the emphasized part of the church&#8217;s narrative especially when dealing with her shortcomings (and at times a means for justification, rather than a silver lining). I am a little more interested in reading about, as you noted, &#8220;the interplay between historical contingencies and the ways in which history &#8216;makes&#8217; us on the one hand, and the reality of transcultural (yet contextually-applied) truths on the other&#8221;. I think the real story of the Church can be found in the story of its members and those &#8220;11th hour&#8221; parts of the Body found in the highways and by-ways of God&#8217;s redemptive plan. I would like to see him emphasize that. At any rate, I have sampled a few of William&#8217;s books from my buddy Matt&#8217;s library, and he appears to be a very engaging writer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia R. Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://percaritatem.com/2010/01/11/rowan-williams-on-the-complexities-of-the-church%e2%80%99s-history-and-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-5579</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia R. Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://percaritatem.com/?p=1811#comment-5579</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Matt.  I also find Williams&#039; work exceedingly encouraging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Matt.  I also find Williams&#8217; work exceedingly encouraging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt boulter</title>
		<link>http://percaritatem.com/2010/01/11/rowan-williams-on-the-complexities-of-the-church%e2%80%99s-history-and-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-5577</link>
		<dc:creator>matt boulter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://percaritatem.com/?p=1811#comment-5577</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this, Cynthia. 

I recently read _Rowan&#039;s Rule_ and was similarly encouraged. I will put this on my reading list. I am grateful to have such a wise archbishop. Indeed, he is one of the reasons I became Anglican / Episcopalian!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this, Cynthia. </p>
<p>I recently read _Rowan&#8217;s Rule_ and was similarly encouraged. I will put this on my reading list. I am grateful to have such a wise archbishop. Indeed, he is one of the reasons I became Anglican / Episcopalian!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
